Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. METHODS: This international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial was done at 84 hospitals in the USA and UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma and measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, had received at least one platinum-based regimen, but not all five standard-of-care drugs, and had received an unlimited number of previous regimens. Patients with serous borderline tumours or tumours containing low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinoma were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral trametinib 2 mg once daily (trametinib group) or one of five standard-of-care treatment options (standard-of-care group): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40-50 mg/m2 by body surface area once every 4 weeks; intravenous topotecan 4 mg/m2 by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; oral letrozole 2·5 mg once daily; or oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region (USA or UK), number of previous regimens (1, 2, or ≥3), performance status (0 or 1), and planned standard-of-care regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival while receiving randomised therapy, as assessed by imaging at baseline, once every 8 weeks for 15 months, and then once every 3 months thereafter, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101788, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 27, 2014, and April 10, 2018, 260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the trametinib group (n=130) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). At the primary analysis, there were 217 progression-free survival events (101 [78%] in the trametinib group and 116 [89%] in the standard-of-care group). Median progression-free survival in the trametinib group was 13·0 months (95% CI 9·9-15·0) compared with 7·2 months (5·6-9·9) in the standard-of-care group (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·36-0·64]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the trametinib group were skin rash (17 [13%] of 128), anaemia (16 [13%]), hypertension (15 [12%]), diarrhoea (13 [10%]), nausea (12 [9%]), and fatigue (ten [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the standard-of-care group were abdominal pain (22 [17%]), nausea (14 [11%]), anaemia (12 [10%]), and vomiting (ten [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Trametinib represents a new standard-of-care option for patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. FUNDING: NRG Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Target Ovarian Cancer, and Novartis.

Dabrafenib- and trametinib-associated glomerular toxicity: A case report.

RATIONALE: Combined treatment with dabrafenib, a B-RAF inhibitor, and trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, is an effective option for patients with metastatic melanoma. A few cases of acute kidney injury associated with tubulointerstitial nephritis and 1 case of nephrotic syndrome have been reported in patients on this drug combination; however, progressive renal injury has not been reported. In this case study, we report a patient with metastatic melanoma who developed glomerular capillary endothelial toxicity and progressive glomerular sclerosis during combination therapy. PATIENT CONCERN: Our patient was an 80-year-old woman with a history of type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION: She was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and commenced combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. OUTCOMES: Her renal function progressively deteriorated; by month 20 after treatment commencement, her serum creatinine level had increased from 1.59 to 3.74 mg/dL. The first kidney biopsy revealed marked glomerular and endothelial cell damage. Her medication was stopped, but no improvement was evident. At 5 months after the first biopsy, her serum creatinine level had increased to 5.46 mg/dL; a second kidney biopsy revealed focal segmental glomerular sclerosis and marked tubulointerstitial fibrosis. She was started on hemodialysis. LESSONS: We describe a patient with a metastatic melanoma who developed progressive kidney failure during treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib. The most prominent microscopy findings were glomerular endothelial damage in the initial kidney biopsy and accelerated glomerular sclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the follow-up biopsy. We hypothesize that a decreased renal reserve and impairment of kidney repair capacity caused by inhibition of B-RAF, a downstream mediator of vascular endothelial growth factor, may explain the progressive kidney injury.

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, reduces endometriosis-associated pain compared with leuprorelin in Japanese women: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 40-mg relugolix (REL) compared with those of leuprorelin (LEU) in women with endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study in Japanese patients. SETTING: Hospitals and clinics. PATIENT(S): Women aged ≥20 years with regular menstrual cycles (25-38 days) experiencing endometriosis or ovarian endometrioma and reporting pelvic pain. INTERVENTION(S): In the REL group, 40 mg of REL was orally administered once a day for 24 weeks. In the LEU group, 3.75 or 1.88 mg of LEU was subcutaneously injected every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the change in the maximum visual analog scale score for pelvic pain from baseline until 28 days before the end of treatment. RESULT(S): Changes in the maximum visual analog scale score were -52.6 ± 1.3 for REL and -57.5 ± 1.4 for LEU. Ovarian endometrioma decreased by 12.26 ± 17.52 cm3 for REL and 14.10 ± 18.81 cm3 for LEU. Drug-related treatment emergent adverse events with an incidence of >10% for both groups were hot flush, metrorrhagia, headache, and genital hemorrhage. Discontinuations from treatment emergent adverse events were 2.9% for REL and 4.3% for LEU. CONCLUSION(S): Relugolix was noninferior to LEU for treating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Safety profiles of both medications were comparable, although menses returned earlier in patients taking REL, a huge benefit for women who plan to conceive after treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03931915.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant low-grade and high-grade glioma (ROAR): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2, basket trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatments are needed to improve outcomes for high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. The activity and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib were evaluated in adult patients with recurrent or progressive BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma. METHODS: This study is part of an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 Rare Oncology Agnostic Research (ROAR) basket trial at 27 community and academic cancer centres in 13 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the USA). The study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2. Patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily orally until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. In the high-grade glioma cohort, patients were required to have measurable disease at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma response criteria and have been treated previously with radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients with low-grade glioma were required to have measurable non-enhancing disease (except pilocytic astrocytoma) at baseline using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology low-grade glioma criteria. The primary endpoint, in the evaluable intention-to-treat population, was investigator-assessed objective response rate (complete response plus partial response for high-grade glioma and complete response plus partial response plus minor response for low-grade glioma). This trial is ongoing, but is closed for enrolment, NCT02034110. FINDINGS: Between April 17, 2014, and July 25, 2018, 45 patients (31 with glioblastoma) were enrolled into the high-grade glioma cohort and 13 patients were enrolled into the low-grade glioma cohort. The results presented here are based on interim analysis 16 (data cutoff Sept 14, 2020). In the high-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 12·7 months (IQR 5·4-32·3) and 15 (33%; 95% CI 20-49) of 45 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including three complete responses and 12 partial responses. In the low-grade glioma cohort, median follow-up was 32·2 months (IQR 25·1-47·8). Nine (69%; 95% CI 39-91) of 13 patients had an objective response by investigator assessment, including one complete response, six partial responses, and two minor responses. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 31 (53%) patients, the most common being fatigue (five [9%]), decreased neutrophil count (five [9%]), headache (three [5%]), and neutropenia (three [5%]). INTERPRETATION: Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed clinically meaningful activity in patients with BRAFV600E mutation-positive recurrent or refractory high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma, with a safety profile consistent with that in other indications. BRAFV600E testing could potentially be adopted in clinical practice for patients with glioma. FUNDING: Novartis.

WEE1 inhibition induces anti-tumor immunity by activating ERV and the dsRNA pathway.

Targeted therapies represent attractive combination partners with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to increase the population of patients who benefit or to interdict the emergence of resistance. We demonstrate that targeting WEE1 up-regulates immune signaling through the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viral defense pathway with subsequent responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade even in cGAS/STING-deficient tumors, which is a typical phenotype across multiple cancer types. WEE1 inhibition increases endogenous retroviral elements (ERVs) expression by relieving SETDB1/H3K9me3 repression through down-regulating FOXM1. ERVs trigger dsRNA stress and interferon response, increasing recruitment of anti-tumor T cells with concurrent PD-L1 elevation in multiple tumor models. Furthermore, combining WEE1 inhibition and PD-L1 blockade induced striking tumor regression in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner. A WEE1 inhibition-induced viral defense signature provides a potentially informative biomarker for patient selection for combination therapy with WEE1 and ICB. WEE1 inhibition stimulates anti-tumor immunity and enhances sensitivity to ICB, providing a rationale for the combination of WEE1 inhibitors and ICB in clinical trials.

Inhaled Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitors prevent the metabolism of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, thereby reducing inflammation. Inhaled PDE4 inhibitors aim to restrict systemic drug exposure to enhance the potential for clinical benefits (in the lungs) versus adverse events (systemically). The orally administered PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast reduces exacerbation rates in the subgroup of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with a history of exacerbations and the presence of chronic bronchitis, but can cause PDE4 related adverse effects due to systemic exposure. CHF6001 is an inhaled PDE4 inhibitor, while inhaled ensifentrine is an inhibitor of both PDE3 and PDE4; antagonism of PDE3 facilitates smooth muscle relaxation and hence bronchodilation. These inhaled PDE inhibitors have both reported positive findings from early phase clinical trials, and have been well tolerated. Longer term trials are needed to firmly establish the clinical benefits of these drugs.

Targeting MUS81 promotes the anticancer effect of WEE1 inhibitor and immune checkpoint blocking combination therapy via activating cGAS/STING signaling in gastric cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Identification of genomic biomarkers to predict the anticancer effects of indicated drugs is considered a promising strategy for the development of precision medicine. DNA endonuclease MUS81 plays a pivotal role in various biological processes during malignant diseases, mainly in DNA damage repair and replication fork stability. Our previous study reported that MUS81 was highly expressed and linked to tumor metastasis in gastric cancer; however, its therapeutic value has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Bioinformatics analysis was used to define MUS81-related differential genes, which were further validated in clinical tissue samples. Gain or loss of function MUS81 cell models were constructed to elucidate the effect and mechanism of MUS81 on WEE1 expression. Moreover, the antitumor effect of targeting MUS81 combined with WEE1 inhibitors was verified using in vivo and in vitro assays. Thereafter, the cGAS/STING pathway was evaluated, and the therapeutic value of MUS81 for immunotherapy of gastric cancer was determined. RESULTS: In this study, MUS81 negatively correlated with the expression of cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1. Furthermore, we identified that MUS81 regulated the ubiquitination of WEE1 via E-3 ligase ß-TRCP in an enzymatic manner. In addition, MUS81 inhibition could sensitize the anticancer effect of the WEE1 inhibitor MK1775 in gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, when MUS81 was targeted, it increased the accumulation of cytosolic DNA induced by MK1775 treatment and activated the DNA sensor STING-mediated innate immunity in the gastric cancer cells. Thus, the WEE1 inhibitor MK1775 specifically enhanced the anticancer effect of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in MUS81 deficient gastric cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide rational evidence that targeting MUS81 could elevate the expression of WEE1 by regulating its ubiquitination and could activate the innate immune response, thereby enhancing the anticancer efficacy of WEE1 inhibitor and immune checkpoint blockade combination therapy in gastric cancer cells.

Pharmacologic control of homeostatic and antigen-driven proliferation to target HIV-1 persistence.

The presence of latent human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) in quiescent memory CD4 + T cells represents a major barrier to viral eradication. Proliferation of memory CD4 + T cells is the primary mechanism that leads to persistence of the latent reservoir, despite effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). Memory CD4 + T cells are long-lived and can proliferate through two mechanisms: homeostatic proliferation via γc-cytokine stimulation or antigen-driven proliferation. Therefore, therapeutic modalities that perturb homeostatic and antigen-driven proliferation, combined with ART, represent promising strategies to reduce the latent reservoir. In this study, we investigated a library of FDA-approved oncology drugs to determine their ability to inhibit homeostatic and/or antigen-driven proliferation. We confirmed potential hits by evaluating their effects on proliferation in memory CD4 + T cells from people living with HIV-1 on ART (PLWH) and interrogated downstream signaling of γc-cytokine stimulation. We found that dasatinib and ponatinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, reduced both homeostatic and antigen-driven proliferationby >65%, with a reduction in viability <45%, ex vivo. In memory CD4 + T cells from PLWH, only dasatinib restricted both homeostatic and antigen-driven proliferation and prevented spontaneous rebound, consistent with promoting a smaller reservoir size. We show that dasatinib restricts IL-7 induced proliferation through STAT5 phosphorylation inhibition. Our results establish that the anti-cancer agent dasatinib is an exciting candidate to be used as an anti-proliferative drug in a clinical trial, since it efficiently blocks proliferation and iswell tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

Uveitis associated with cancer immunotherapy: long-term outcomes.

Background: We report the long-term outcome of uveitis associated with cancer immunotherapy (CIT). Methods: This retrospective review included serial patients with CIT-associated uveitis treated using various regimen. Results: Eight patients treated with rituximab (anti-CD20), nivolumab (anti-PD-1), ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), vemurafenib and dabrafenib (anti-BRAF), trametinib (anti-MEK) and ibritunib showed uveitis with hypopion (one patient), macular edema (five patients) and choroiditis (two patients). Various regimens of corticosteroid therapy showed a favorable ophthalmological outcome, whether the CIT was continuing or suspended. Conclusion: Local corticosteroid injections in combination with CIT could be suggested as a first-line treatment. This could help to preserve the quality of life without threatening the vital prognosis.

Lay abstract This study aims to report the long-term outcome of intra-ocular inflammation (uveitis) associated with cancer immunotherapy (CIT). Serial patients complaining of blurred vision and painful eyes showed intra-ocular inflammation that was related to CIT, after infectious, inflammatory and tumoral causes of uveitis have been ruled out. The length of follow-up was more than 12 months for most patients. Eight serial patients treated with rituximab (anti-CD20), nivolumab (anti-PD-1), ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), vemurafenib and dabrafenib (anti-BRAF), trametinib (anti-MEK) and ibritunib showed intra-ocular inflammation with hypopion (one patient), macular edema (five patients) and choroiditis (two patients). Various regimens of corticosteroid therapy showed a favorable ophthalmological outcome, whether the CIT was continuing or suspended. Local corticosteroid injections in combination with CIT could be suggested as a first-line treatment. This could help to preserve the quality of life without threatening the vital prognosis.

Rapamycin and trametinib: a rational combination for treatment of NSCLC.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is one of the most commonly activated pathways in human cancers, including lung cancer. Targeting mTOR with molecule inhibitors is considered as a useful therapeutic strategy. However, the results obtained from the clinical trials with the inhibitors so far have not met the original expectations, largely because of the drug resistance. Thus, combined or multiple drug therapy can bring about more favorable clinical outcomes. Here, we found that activation of ERK pathway was responsible for rapamycin drug resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Accordingly, rapamycin-resistant NSCLC cells were more sensitive to ERK inhibitor (ERKi), trametinib, and in turn, trametinib-resistant NSCLC cells were also susceptible to rapamycin. Combining rapamycin with trametinib led to a potent synergistic antitumor efficacy, which induced G1-phase cycle arrest and apoptosis. In addition, rapamycin synergized with another ERKi, MEK162, and in turn, trametinib synergized with other mTORi, Torin1 and OSI-027. Mechanistically, rapamycin in combination with trametinib resulted in a greater decrease of phosphorylation of AKT, ERK, mTOR and 4EBP1. In xenograft mouse model, co-administration of rapamycin and trametinib caused a substantial suppression in tumor growth without obvious drug toxicity. Overall, our study identifies a reasonable combined strategy for treatment of NSCLC.

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is standard treatment for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer. GnRH agonist therapy results in an initial testosterone flare, and increased metabolic and cardiovascular risks. The GnRH antagonist relugolix is able to reduce serum testosterone levels in men with prostate cancer without inducing testosterone flare. In the HERO Phase III trial, relugolix was superior to leuprolide acetate at rapidly reducing testosterone and continuously suppressing testosterone, with faster post-treatment recovery of testosterone levels. Relugolix was associated with a 54% lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than leuprolide acetate. As the first oral GnRH antagonist approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, relugolix offers a new treatment option.

Lay abstract The male sex hormone testosterone promotes the growth of prostate cancer cells. Some drug treatments for prostate cancer, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists and antagonists, work to reduce the production of testosterone. However, GnRH receptor agonists like leuprolide acetate can increase testosterone levels at first, before reducing it, and this temporary increase can cause side effects, such as bone pain. Drugs of this type have also been linked to a higher risk of heart attacks, strokes, and death. Relugolix works a different way; it is a GnRH receptor antagonist that reduces testosterone without an initial increase. A clinical study showed that relugolix reduced testosterone levels more quickly than leuprolide acetate, a commonly used injectable drug for the treatment of prostate cancer. After stopping treatment, levels of testosterone in the blood returned to normal faster in men who received relugolix than in men who received leuprolide acetate. Men who received relugolix had a lower incidence of heart attacks, strokes, and death compared with men who received leuprolide acetate. The US FDA approved relugolix as the first oral, once-daily GnRH receptor antagonist for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, offering men a new treatment option.

A novel treatment strategy for lapatinib resistance in a subset of HER2-amplified gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification occurs in approximately 13-23% of all GC cases and patients with HER2 overexpression exhibit a poor prognosis. Lapatinib, a dual EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is an effective agent to treat HER2-amplified breast cancer but it failed in gastric cancer (GC) clinical trials. However, the molecular mechanism of lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC is not well studied. METHODS: We employed an unbiased, genome-scale screening with pooled CRISPR library on HER2-amplified GC cell lines to identify genes that are associated with resistance to lapatinib. To validate the candidate genes, we applied in vitro and in vivo pharmacological tests to confirm the function of the target genes. RESULTS: We found that loss of function of CSK or PTEN conferred lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC cell lines NCI-N87 and OE19, respectively. Moreover, PI3K and MAPK signaling was significantly increased in CSK or PTEN null cells. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological study has shown that lapatinib resistance by the loss of function of CSK or PTEN, could be overcome by lapatinib combined with the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and MEK inhibitor trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that loss-of-function mutations of CSK and PTEN cause lapatinib resistance by re-activating MAPK and PI3K pathways, and further proved these two pathways are druggable targets. Inhibiting the two pathways synergistically are effective to overcome lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC. This study provides insights for understanding the resistant mechanism of HER2 targeted therapy and novel strategies that may ultimately overcome resistance or limited efficacy of lapatinib treatment for subset of HER2 amplified GC.

MEK inhibition overcomes resistance to EphA2-targeted therapy in uterine cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our pilot clinical study of EphA2 inhibitor (dasatinib) plus paclitaxel and carboplatin showed interesting clinical activity in endometrial cancer with manageable toxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms of dasatinib resistance in uterine cancer are unknown. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms underlying resistance to EphA2 inhibitors in uterine cancer and examined the anti-tumor activity of EphA2 inhibitors alone and in combination with a MEK inhibitor. METHODS: We evaluated the antitumor activity of EphA2 inhibitors plus a MEK inhibitor using in vitro and in vivo orthotopic models of uterine cancer. RESULTS: EphA2 inhibitor induced MAPK in dasatinib-resistant uterine cancer cells (HEC-1A and Ishikawa) and BRAF/CRAF heterodimerization in HEC-1A cells. EphA2 inhibitor and trametinib significantly increased apoptosis in cancer cells resistant to EphA2 inhibitors compared with controls (p < 0.01). An in vivo study with the orthotopic HEC-1A model showed significantly greater antitumor response to combination treatment compared with dasatinib alone (p < 0.01). Combination treatment increased EphrinA1 and BIM along with decreased pMAPK, Jagged 1, and c-MYC expression in dasatinib-resistant cells. In addition, Spearman analysis using the TCGA data revealed that upregulation of EphA2 was significantly correlated with JAG1, MYC, NOTCH1, NOTCH3 and HES1 expression (p < 0.001, r = 0.25-0.43). Specifically, MAP3K15 and the NOTCH family genes were significantly related to poor clinical outcome in patients with uterine cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the MAPK pathway is activated in dasatinib-resistant uterine cancer cells and that EphrinA1-mediated MEK inhibition overcomes dasatinib resistance. Dual targeting of both EphA2 and MEK, combined with chemotherapy, should be considered for future clinical development.

Targeting CDK4/6 Represents a Therapeutic Vulnerability in Acquired BRAF/MEK Inhibitor-Resistant Melanoma.

There is a clear need to identify targetable drivers of resistance and potential biomarkers for salvage therapy for patients with melanoma refractory to the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibition. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing on BRAF-V600E-mutant melanoma patient tumors refractory to the combination of BRAF/MEK inhibition and identified acquired oncogenic mutations in NRAS and loss of the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A We hypothesized the acquired resistance mechanisms to BRAF/MEK inhibition were reactivation of the MAPK pathway and activation of the cell-cycle pathway, which can both be targeted pharmacologically with the combination of a MEK inhibitor (trametinib) and a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib). In vivo, we found that combination of CDK4/6 and MEK inhibition significantly decreased tumor growth in two BRAF/MEK inhibitor-resistant patient-derived xenograft models. In vitro, we observed that the combination of CDK4/6 and MEK inhibition resulted in synergy and significantly reduced cellular growth, promoted cell-cycle arrest, and effectively inhibited downstream signaling of MAPK and cell-cycle pathways in BRAF inhibitor-resistant cell lines. Knockdown of CDKN2A in BRAF inhibitor-resistant cells increased sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibition alone and in combination with MEK inhibition. A key implication of our study is that the combination of CDK4/6 and MEK inhibitors overcomes acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and loss of CDKN2A may represent a biomarker of response to the combination. Inhibition of the cell-cycle and MAPK pathway represents a promising strategy for patients with metastatic melanoma who are refractory to BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy.

Antitumor effect of WEE1 blockade as monotherapy or in combination with cisplatin in urothelial cancer.

Overcoming cisplatin (CDDP) resistance is a major issue in urothelial cancer (UC), in which CDDP-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment. WEE1, a G2 /M checkpoint kinase, confers chemoresistance in response to genotoxic agents. However, the efficacy of WEE1 blockade in UC has not been reported. MK-1775, a WEE1 inhibitor also known as AZD-1775, blocked proliferation of UC cell lines in a dose-dependent manner irrespective of TP53 status. MK-1775 synergized with CDDP to block proliferation, inducing apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe in TP53-mutant UC cells but not in TP53-WT cells. Knocking down TP53 in TP53-WT cells induced synergism of MK-1775 and CDDP. In UMUC3 cell xenografts and two patient-derived xenograft lines with MDM2 overexpression, in which the p53/cell cycle pathway was inactivated, AZD-1775 combined with CDDP suppressed tumor growth inducing both M-phase entry and apoptosis, whereas AZD-1775 alone was as effective as the combination in RT4 cell xenografts. Drug susceptibility assay using an ex vivo cancer tissue-originated spheroid system showed correlations with the in vivo efficacy of AZD-1775 alone or combined with CDDP. We determined the feasibility of the drug susceptibility assay using spheroids established from UC surgical specimens obtained by transurethral resection. In conclusion, WEE1 is a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of UC, and a highly specific small molecule inhibitor is currently in early phase clinical trials for cancer. Differential antitumor efficacy of WEE1 blockade alone or combined with CDDP could exist according to p53/cell cycle pathway activity, which might be predictable using an ex vivo 3D primary culture system.

A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of TPN171H, a Novel Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: TPN171H is a novel, potent and selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TPN171H in healthy subjects after single and multiple dosing, in addition, to investigate the food effect on pharmacokinetics and safety of TPN171H. METHODS: The entire study was comprised of three parts: Part I (single ascending-dose study), Part II (food effect study), and Part III (multiple ascending-dose study). A total of 63 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. TPN171H tablet or placebo was administered per protocol requirements. Blood samples were collected at the designated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety was assessed by clinical examinations and adverse events. RESULTS: In Part I, AUC and Cmax were proved to be linear within the 5-30 mg dose range. T1/2 of TPN171H was 8.02-10.88 h. In Part II, we figured out that TPN171H administration under fed condition could decrease Cmax, prolong Tmax, but had no effect on AUC. In Part III, the accumulation ratio at steady-state for AUC and Cmax indicated that TPN171H has a slight accumulation upon repeated dosing. Subjects were generally tolerable after TPN171H administration. Compared with other PDE5 inhibitors, TPN171H was found to have no impact on blood pressure and color discrimination. CONCLUSION: TPN171H was safe and generally tolerated in healthy subjects. Based on the half-life, food effect, and safety profile of TPN171H, we recommend a once-daily, post-meal administration of TPN171H in subsequent clinical studies in healthy subjects and patients with PAH.

Efficacy, safety and factors associated with disease progression in patients with unresectable (stage III) or distant metastatic (stage IV) BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: An open label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib.

BACKGROUND: BRAF and MEK inhibitors combination, including dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) have transformed the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma patients, including patients with brain metastasis (BM). In a large phase IIIb, single-arm, open-label, multicenter French study, we assessed safety, response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) and factors associated with progression, and stratified the population into risk groups. METHODS: Patients with unresectable, advanced, BRAF V600-mutant melanoma were included, including those with the presence of BM, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤2, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) or previous melanoma treatments. Responses were determined locally, without central review. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and modelled with multivariate Cox model. Risk subgroups were identified using a regression tree analysis. RESULTS: Between March 2015 and November 2016, 856 patients received at least one D + T dose. Overall, 92% had stage IV melanoma, 38% ECOG PS ≥1, 32% BM and 37.5% elevated LDH. Median PFS was 8.02 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.33-8.77). Significant factors associated with lower PFS were ECOG PS ≥1, elevated LDH, ≥3 metastatic sites and presence of BM. Patients with <3 metastatic sites, ECOG = 0 and no BM had the highest probability of PFS at 6 months (83%, 95% CI 76-87) and 12 months (56%, 95% CI 47-64), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest prospective study in advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma patients treated with D + T, conducted in conditions close to 'real-world practice'. We confirm previous findings that LDH, ECOG PS and ≥3 metastatic sites are associated with shorter PFS, but the real-world setting introduces BM as a major prognostic factor.

WEE1 Inhibitor: Clinical Development.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: WEE1 inhibitor has been shown to potential chemotherapy or radiotherapy sensitivity in preclinical models, particularly in p53-mutated or deficient cancer cells although not exclusively. Here, we review the clinical development of WEE1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy as well as its combination with different novel agents. RECENT FINDINGS: Although several clinical trials have shown that WEE1 inhibitor can be safely combined with different chemotherapy agents as well as radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy, its clinical development has been hampered by the higher rate of grade 3 toxicities when added to standard treatments. A few clinical trials had also been conducted to test WEE1 inhibitor using TP53 mutation as a predictive biomarker. However, TP53 mutation has not been shown to be the most reliable predictive biomarker and the benefit of adding WEE1 inhibitor to chemotherapy has been modest, even in TP53 biomarker-driven studies. There are ongoing clinical trials testing WEE1 inhibitor with novel agents such as ATR and PAPR inhibitors as well as anti-PDL1 immunotherapy, which may better define the role of WEE1 inhibitor in the future if any of the novel treatment combination will show superior anti-tumor efficacy with a good safety profile compared to monotherapy and/or standard treatment.